Does God need lawyers? Jesus Christ, who came to this earth 2,000 years ago, seemed to think it was necessary. Around the world, atheism has long been rampant among intellectuals, including scientists, and God has been mocked. Not only this. Believers in God have forgotten their religious duties and are taking the lead in persecuting people. To make it clear, neither is God＊s true form. So God has decided to come again, just as He had promised long ago. But before that, He has sent a lawyer as his representative to deliver the news. Then, a person appeared who claimed to be this lawyer. August 2021, she published <The Evolution Of Sex Through The Inheritance Of Life History And Speciation As A Result Of The Use And Disuse Of Organs>. It is a book that reveals the mechanism of sexual evolution and the validity of Lamarck＊s theory of evolution. Now her second book <Can Macron offer Biden the Restoration of Women＊s Abortion Rights?> (Feb 24, 2023 / Evolution and Humans) has been released, the woman lawyer Kwon Sung-hee who hears God＊s Voice delivers the message alongside her arguments on our special section. Below is the summary of the interview with her.

▲ Lawyer Kwon Sung-hee

Q1. So you say that Jesus Christ sends us a lawyer as His representative?

A1. Looking back, it was none other than an invitation from God, that I wrote my first book after fierce wandering of studying biology for 5 years from the strong impression that Darwin’s theory of evolution was wrong. Chapters 14-16 of John’s Gospel repeat Jesus’ words to his disciples before his death that he would send the Advocate as his representative. Jesus also called it “the Holy Spirit,” and later generations interpreted it as “the Holy Spirit, the Comforter.” The role given by Jesus to the advocate is to “praise and exalt Jesus by emphasizing his identity and teachings,” “to define and enforce divine justice, sin, and judgment,” and “to lead the world to all truth and to declare what is to come.” So, after all, the advocate must be a person. I came across this verse while reading an English Bible at the end of last year, and as soon as I saw it, I was convinced it was me.

 

Q2. How could you be sure that Jesus’ representative lawyer was you?

A2. Throughout my high school years, I heard the phrase in my mind many times that I was the one who consummate Western civilization. When I was a freshman in college, I was in the process of converting to Christianity, and as I was cleaning my hair in the basement washroom, Jesus was in front of me and said, “The truth will set you free.” When I was in my late 40’s, I heard Jehovah God’s voice say: “Humans must stop being arrogant.” When I was in my 30s, I was pessimistic because I didn’t have the aptitude to be a lawyer. Then I heard Jesus’ voice saying, “You wanted it (the lawyer’s job).” Looking back, I prayed a vow, saying, “If you pass me the bar exam, I will be better in believing in God.” In fact, after graduating from high school, I couldn’t think of studying in Seoul due to my family’s circumstances. But Jesus also granted my wish to go to Seoul, and I made myself a judicial scholarship student at Ewha Women’s University. Last year, I was even honored to be the vice president of the Korean Bar Association. I thought that I was not qualified to be a vice president because I neglected my lawyer’s job for the last 4~5 years due to writing a book. But come to think of it, this book wouldn’t have come out if I hadn’t joined the Korean Bar Association.

 

Q3. Scientists and intellectuals around the world take the stand of atheists. So for them, what you’re saying can be hard to believe. How do you think?

A3. I perused 400 biology books. This confirms the scientific validity of Lamarck’s theory of evolution. And if I hadn’t written a book revealing this, I would have thought the same like them (scientist and intellectuals). I came to believe in God through Jesus’ direct evangelism, but I failed to become an institutional Christian. I think the reason was that I didn’t know enough about God’s science. God is a scientific being that evolved along with Homo sapiens, who acquired language as a tool for thinking in the process of evolution of the genus Homo and lived by knowledge, while coping with the ignorance that constantly causes anxiety. In Lamarck’s theory of evolution, God and man are twins. So it’s no wonder I hear God’s voice.

 

Q4. According to a theory of evolution, you say Gods exist or not exist? We are confused. 

A4. This is a time when science is very advanced, and people think within the scientific paradigm. In his book <The Structure of Scientific Revolutions>, eminent historian of science Thomas Kuhn said that ‘recognizing functional deficiencies that cause crises in both political and scientific development is a prerequisite for revolution.’ Darwin’s theory of evolution sees life as a machine for genes to replicate themselves. This means that it could not explain the ‘scientificity of women’s abortions and the sexual minorities that do not accompany childbirth (reproduction)’. Scientism pushes everything that cannot be measured ‘as unscientific’, so it blasphemes God as a delusion or the parasite in the brain. But according to Lamarck evolution, these are all very typical life phenomena. Darwin’s theory of evolution has no role either scientifically or politically and therefore should be discarded. 

Q5. You say a paradigm shift. Does this mean that in Lamarckism, God, abortion, and sexual minorities are scientific phenomena? 

A5. The perfect God is a scientific companion who evolved to be with imperfect humans. God is the one who wipes away tears when women conceive an unwelcome child and people struggle with their identity or when they are in such pain. Just because human beings can distinguish good from evil through language as an excellent thinking tool does not immediately make them a god-like being. The biological meaning of “original sin” is that humans are merely “animals that can speak.” God does not judge, acknowledging that this is a human condition. Jesus Christ fits the Lamarckian view of God in every way. “I have not come to judge the world, but to save,” and “Sinners and the sick need me.” as Jesus said. God is a being who stays with humans forever unless they become extinct. Most of Christ’s words, such as “You did not choose me, but I chose you” and “I will be with you until the end of the world” fit the scientific facts very well.

 

Q6. The scientific community has long been dominated by Darwinism, so how is the transition to Lamarckism possible?

A6. Evolution is the principle by which male and female members of a species are formed. The evolution of sex in biology is unknown. As I explained in detail in a book published two years ago, when I discovered the mechanism of sex evolution, it was impossible to discuss speciation without knowing the evolution of sex. That’s why the existing biological community unreasonably sided with Darwin. Organisms are divided into prokaryotes, eukaryotic unicellular organisms (let’s call them “protists” for convenience) and multicellular organisms. Protists and multicellular organisms inherit the life history and traits of prokaryotes, their progenitors. And they evolved sexual reproduction in the process of modifying and adapting it to suit the presence or absence of a nucleus and multicellularity. It is the official position of the scientific community that, Endosymbiotic theory, eukaryotic single-celled organisms evolved through predation events among prokaryotes. Plants as well as animals in the early stages of evolution live a fixed life in water. So I deduced that protists acquired multicellularity through underwater sedimentation and evolved into multicellular organisms. If so, it must be said that all living things have prokaryotic properties. Therefore, it appears that prokaryotic life history or traits are also expressed in descendants as needed. 

 

Q7. Please enlighten us with the details of Lamarck’s theory of evolution.

A7. There is only one law that governs all living things: the pre-survival, post-reproduction. All living things first consolidate their survival and then reproduce. All living things in the three realms form ecological status, which means that they will coexist peacefully by eliminating competition that is dangerous to their survival. Sexual reproduction, which evolved in the process of protists seeking survival when the environment is unfavorable and then reproducing after the environment improves, is also a phenomenon of pre-survival, post-reproduction. In the case of sexual reproduction of multicellular organisms, the queen reproduction, sex change, monogamy, polygamy, and sexual dimorphism are also the result of pre-survival, post-reproduction. Multicellular organisms act in an ecological niche by first securing survival and then reproducing. Therefore, the Lamarck’s core theory of evolution, ‘simultaneous evolution of male and female by the use and disuse of organs’ and my ‘pre-survival post-reproduction’ inevitably go hand in hand. Each species of multicellular organisms is evolved when the male and female acquire the survival traits jointly first, and then acquire the reproductive traits separately but simultaneously.

 

Q8. Does this mean that the origin of sex and male and female formation has been clarified?

A8. The reason multicellular organisms are male and female is derived from that when protists reproduce sexually, they form only two germ cells: sperm and egg. This is to prevent over-splicing, and excessive number of chromosomes results in malformations and infertility. Multicellular organisms that evolved by acquiring multicellularity from protists, also form only sperm and eggs. Protists are sexless because they form two gametes from the somatic cell. Even in multicellular organisms, descendant organisms that evolved earlier form sperm and egg as hermaphrodites. However, since animals live while moving, it is not easy to cross-fertilize as a hermaphrodite body. From echinoderms and mollusks with much movement, male and female gametophytes are separated (male and female bodies) but evolve simultaneously, producing each eggs and sperm at the same time and reproducing by sexual intercourse. This is the origin of sex.

 

Q9. What does it mean to distinguish between biological and social gender?

Q9. The biological sex of multicellular organisms is male and female derives from the formation of only two germ cells from protists: sperm and egg. However, each species of living beings additionally adapts in its respective ecological status, so social sex (gender) appears, and this is the true sex of that species. Bees and ants, clownfish and naked mole rats reproduce only in queens. The reason is that, in their ecological status, if all females reproduce, the members of that species do not have a single chance of survival. They are divided into two genders: the breeding queen and the infertile female. Clownfish are divided into two male genders: one breeding male per queen and several immature males, but there is no problem with the biological adaptation of all these individuals. This means that all living things are the first to survive, and reproduction is not a problem even if they don’t do it according to the situation. It’s awkward to compare humans to insects and fish, but I think we can understand that the same biological paradigm applies to our LGBTI phenomenon. After all, we humans are living things.

Q10. The book’s subtitle is ‘Lamarck has returned with Jesus Christ’. You proudly claim the Second Coming of Christ. But do you think that makes sense?

A10. According to the Gospel of John, the authority that Jesus granted to the lawyer is limited to “(the agent) does not speak according to his own thoughts, but as he has received and heard (from Jesus).” However, it is comprehensive, defining God’s justice, sin, and judgment, proclaiming all truth, and declaring what is to come. The term here should be taken to mean within the Lamarckism paradigm. After all, it must be said that Lamarckism is God’s justice and Darwinism is God’s sin, judgment is done accordingly, and this is all truth. In the Bible, signs of Jesus’ Second Coming are detailed in Mark (chapter 13), Matthew (chapter 24), and Luke (chapter 21). One of them, “people being persecuted because of Jesus,” would include the intellectuals and scientists today who claim atheism as if it were science and despise those who believe in God. I cautiously speculate that ‘I see an abomination standing in a holy place’ means that the temple is being used as a different place. There are also signs that ‘great tribulation will come that has never been and will never come that day’ and that ‘women who are pregnant and those who have nursing babies on that day are dreadful.’ Is it unreasonable to interpret it as ‘women who are pregnant and with nursing babies suffer horribly because of the violation of abortion rights in the United States today‘ if I judge from the fact that Jesus’ words, “I will rebuild the destroyed temple in three days,” were interpreted by the disciples as being resurrected in three days? Isn’t the phrase ‘lightning flashes from the east and flashes to the west’ a metaphor for my involvement as an Asian? Jesus promised: “I will not leave you orphans, but I will return.” I believe that God always keeps His promises. Jesus is coming to judge intellectuals and scientists for taking God from people and turning them into orphans, and for religious people to persecute aborted women and sexual minorities. 

 

Q11. Why did President Macron and President Biden appear in the title of the book?

A11. Biden is the president of the Democratic Party of the United States and is working to reclaim women’s abortion rights. President Macron expressed solidarity with American women as president of the homeland of Lamarck, the founder of biology. If the two presidents knew my scientific findings, they wouldn’t stand idly by for American women, so I put them in the title of the book. Modern democracies would be blessed to have wise leaders like them. May my discovery be widely publicized so that, as the Bible promises, ‘the day may be shortened for those whom God chose.’ I wish President Biden a smooth re-election. 

 

Q12. If what you said above were to be known in the religious, scientific, and political worlds, the impact would be enormous.

A12. The key is that my findings must be known and their scientific justification recognized. If the scientific nature of sexual evolution and the new theory of evolution are recognized, then the Second Coming of Christ should be recognized accordingly. When I finished the book in August 2021, I thought, “I am in charge of the Second Coming of Jesus and of consummating Western civilization through integration of religion and science.” From then on I called myself ‘Latter-day John the Baptist,’ and by the guidance of Christ’s voice, I have come to the present. Christ encourages us to pursue the truth in earnest, believing in the potential of “us, talking animals.” Truth is not only our right, but also our duty. 

원헤레나 기자  hywon65@gmail.com